<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Temporal Auditory Feedback Perturbation | Fengyue Lisa Zhao</title><link>https://zhaofylisa.github.io/tags/temporal-auditory-feedback-perturbation/</link><atom:link href="https://zhaofylisa.github.io/tags/temporal-auditory-feedback-perturbation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Temporal Auditory Feedback Perturbation</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Unpredictable Temporal Feedback Perturbation Dissociates Mismatch Detection from Correction</title><link>https://zhaofylisa.github.io/project/tfp/</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://zhaofylisa.github.io/project/tfp/</guid><description>&lt;p>This study investigates the online response of the speech motor control system to temporally perturbed auditory feedback using a novel &lt;strong>Unpredictable Temporal Feedback Perturbation (UTFP)&lt;/strong> paradigm. Unlike Adaptive Temporal Feedback Perturbation (ATFP), in which predictable perturbations induce adaptation over repeated trials, UTFP applies brief temporal perturbations at random times on random trials to isolate the immediate, online response of the system.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Perturbations were applied within productions of the phrase “I saw papa yesterday,” where papa had either a strong–weak (PApa) or weak–strong (paPA) stress pattern. We examined effects of the perturbation on segmental duration and local relative speech rate in the target words PApa and paPA.&lt;/p>
&lt;p>Our results show that, in contrast to ATFP responses, UTFP responses are delayed, manifesting as a transient slowing of speech approximately 300–600 ms after the perturbation. Moreover, the response effect is always lengthening, rather than being compensatory, as observed in ATFP. This suggests that the UTFP response is driven by a generic sensory mismatch detection mechanism, not a mismatch correction system. Similar to ATFP responses, we found that UTFP response magnitudes are modulated by phonological structure, being larger in vowels than consonants, in stressed than unstressed syllables, and in word-final than word-initial syllables. Substantial interspeaker variation in the timecourse of UTFP responses was correlated with speech rate, suggesting a relation between rate of speech and attention to sensory feedback.&lt;/p></description></item></channel></rss>